You are currently viewing Sendspark vs Loom vs Bubbles: Async Client Video Messaging Showdown (2025)

Sendspark vs Loom vs Bubbles: Async Client Video Messaging Showdown (2025)

In 2025, async video isn’t just a productivity trend — it’s how modern teams build trust, close deals, and reduce meetings.

If you’re in SaaS sales, customer success, or client onboarding, tools like Sendspark, Loom, and Bubbles offer a faster, more human way to connect.

This guide compares these three async video tools to help you choose the one best suited for your workflow, tech stack, and client experience.

Quick Comparison Table

FeatureSendsparkLoomBubbles
Best ForPersonalized outreachInternal async commsAsync feedback + annotation
Screen + Webcam Recording✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes
Client Personalization✅ Dynamic merge fields❌ No❌ No
Call-to-Action Buttons✅ Branded CTAs⚠️ View + reply❌ Not built-in
Comments + Threading⚠️ None✅ Reactions + comments✅ Threaded video replies
Collaboration✅ Team workspace✅ Workspace + sharing✅ Collaborative feedback
Chrome Extension✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes
AI Features⚠️ Not native✅ AI summaries (Pro)✅ Transcripts + context AI
Pricing Starts AtFree / $15/monthFree / $12.50/monthFree / $8/month

1. Sendspark

Overview:
Sendspark is built for sales outreach, customer onboarding, and client engagement — letting you create personalized videos with dynamic fields and brand kits.

Best For:
Sales reps, CS teams, and marketers creating custom async outreach.

Key Features:

  • Personalized video merge tags (first name, company, etc.)
  • CTAs, branding, and video landing pages
  • Chrome extension for Gmail, HubSpot, LinkedIn
  • Analytics + view tracking
  • Request video replies

Pros:
✔ Personalized at scale
✔ Brand customization
✔ Outreach-friendly integrations
✔ Strong for sales videos

Cons:
✖ No threaded commenting
✖ No in-video annotation
✖ No AI summarization

Pricing:
Free plan available
Paid starts at $15/month (Pro)

Sendspark

2. Loom

Overview:
Loom is a go-to for quick, async videos — from bug reports to team updates and training walkthroughs.

Best For:
Product teams, internal updates, async culture.

Key Features:

  • Screen + face recording
  • Viewer comments, reactions
  • Embed videos in Slack, Notion, docs
  • AI summaries (Pro)
  • Mobile + desktop apps

Pros:
✔ Lightning-fast recording
Super easy to share + view
✔ Great free plan
✔ Works well internally

Cons:
✖ No personalized CTAs
✖ Limited branding customization
✖ Not optimized for sales videos

Pricing:
Free plan available
Business plan: $12.50/month

Loom

3. Bubbles

Overview:
Bubbles is built around async team feedback — turning screen recordings into threaded discussions, without live meetings.

Best For:
Remote teams needing annotated video conversations on work in progress.

Key Features:

  • Record screen + face
  • Threaded comments and replies
  • Time-stamped feedback threads
  • Chrome + desktop app
  • Shared workspaces for context

Pros:
✔ Great for async review cycles
✔ Seamless time-stamped feedback
✔ Ideal for internal use
✔ Free to get started

Cons:
✖ Not built for external/client use
✖ No outreach tools or CTAs
✖ No deep branding features

Pricing:
Free plan available
Paid: $8/month (Starter)

Bubbles

Use Case Recommendations

Use CaseBest Tool
Personalized video outreachSendspark
Async team updates + bug walkthroughLoom
Annotated feedback on deliverablesBubbles
Branded onboarding videosSendspark
Reply-enabled async communicationBubbles
Sharing video in Slack/NotionLoom

Final Verdict

  • Use Sendspark if you want to send personalized client videos with branded CTAs and track performance.
  • Use Loom if you need to share internal updates, tutorials, or async feedback quickly and professionally.
  • Use Bubbles if you’re giving time-stamped video feedback on projects or creative deliverables.

Leave a Reply